Emily Estanislau
blog post 3
11/2/14
Libertarianism and Determinism
In the free will debate there are
two sides, either the libertarians or the determinists. Libertarians believe
that we are able to control and change our actions. We are in charge and
responsible for our own actions. While determinists on the other hand believe
that humans lack free will. They argue that human actions were only caused by
other events that had happened psychologically or physically in the past.
I believe that libertarianism is
more plausible than determinism because it can explain the choices that humans
make. An example that shows free will from the reading is when Gandhi fasted
for a week because he wanted India to get its independence. He was fully
responsible for his decision to fast for India’s independence. Another example
in the reading is the man stealing bread because he was hungry. This man was in
charge and responsible for his own actions, he was never forced to steal the
bread.
Libertarianism has more explanatory
breadth because it is able to explain human actions better. Libertarianism is
better at explaining because humans are responsible and are able to control our
actions. Determinism on the other hand only explains our behavior by external
forces.
Determinism has more explanatory
depth than libertarianism because it focuses on different external forces that
have happened in the past. Determinism can explain their behavior because they
can blame it on society or other external causes. An example would be a person
being afraid of dogs because of a traumatic experience that happened in their
childhood. Another example would be a person stealing because they were forced.
Determinism explains human behavior in greater detail.
Determinism is more simplistic
because it has fewer parts in explaining human behavior than libertarianism. This
is because with determinism there is only one cause for human behavior and that
is caused by past events.
For conservatism it is both
determinism and libertarianism. This is because it depends on their point of
view and certain beliefs on things.
1.
Libertarianism and determinism are the most
plausible explanation for the causes of human behavior
2.
Libertarianism has much more explanatory breadth,
whereas determinism has more simplicity and explanatory depth.
3.
Therefore, libertarianism is the best explanation
for human behavior.
I agree with you but it could use more examples on libertarianism and determinism. Humans do have control of their actions but in certain decisions they are forced to do something they don't want to do.
ReplyDeleteI agree that we have free choice but the bred stealing example is a little flimsy as that cam be taken that something externally pushed him to steal the bread. The external force would have been his hunger
ReplyDeleteI agree that libertarians believe that they can change and control our actions but I think that there could have been more proof shown in this.
ReplyDelete